Blog | Airsight | Drone Detection Technology to improve your security

LiDAR vs. Radar: Why Radar Remains the Superior Choice for Drone Detection

Written by Roudy Chamy | Apr 14, 2025 10:46:04 AM

As drone threats evolve—from hobbyist intrusions to highly autonomous, stealthy UAVs—so does the technology needed to detect and neutralize them. LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) has entered the conversation as a high-resolution mapping tool, but how does it really compare to radar when it comes to airspace security?

At AirSight, we specialize in radar-based drone detection for one key reason: radar is more effective, scalable, and reliable in real-world security scenarios.

LiDAR vs. Radar: What’s the Difference?

Both LiDAR and radar are sensing technologies that detect objects by sending out a signal and measuring what bounces back. But the signals they use—and how they perform—are very different:

Feature

Radar

LiDAR

Signal Type

Radio waves (long wavelength)

Laser light (short wavelength)

Range

Long-range (hundreds to thousands of meters)

Short-range (typically under 100 meters)

Resolution

Lower spatial resolution

High spatial resolution

All-Weather?

Yes – performs in rain, fog, snow, dust

No – degraded by fog, rain, bright light

Cost & Scalability

Scalable and cost-effective for large areas

Expensive and limited in coverage

Where LiDAR Falls Short in Drone Detection

While LiDAR delivers high-resolution 3D point clouds—great for tasks like surveying or autonomous vehicle navigation—it faces serious limitations for drone detection, especially in outdoor security environments:

  • Limited Range: LiDAR is typically effective within ~100 meters. For most drone detection scenarios, this is not nearly enough warning time to respond to threats.

  • Line-of-Sight Dependency: LiDAR must "see" the drone directly to detect it. If the drone is behind a building or tree, it’s invisible to the sensor.

  • Environmental Sensitivity: Fog, rain, snow, and bright sunlight all interfere with LiDAR performance. For airspace security, reliability in all conditions is critical.

  • Cost and Coverage: Covering a large facility or campus with LiDAR requires many sensors—each expensive and power-hungry.

Why Radar is Better for Real-World Drone Detection

At AirSight, we use radar as the foundation of our AirGuard system because it delivers consistent, scalable performance across a wide range of operational scenarios:

✅ Long-Range, 360° Coverage

Radar can detect drones hundreds of meters—or even kilometers—away, giving security teams the time they need to assess and respond. With 360° coverage and no need for line-of-sight visuals, radar monitors airspace continuously and effectively.

✅ Reliable in All Weather

Rain? Snow? Fog? No problem. Radar’s radio waves aren’t affected by atmospheric conditions, making it ideal for year-round, 24/7 operation—unlike LiDAR, which can be rendered ineffective by fog or heavy rain.

✅ Scalable for Large Sites

One radar unit can cover a wide area, and multiple units can be networked to expand detection zones seamlessly. This makes radar far more cost-effective for protecting prisons, campuses, airports, and industrial facilities.

✅ Optimized for Drone Detection

Modern radar systems, like those integrated into AirGuard, are specifically tuned to pick up the small radar cross-sections of consumer and commercial drones—even those designed to evade detection.

LiDAR Has Its Place—But Not as the Primary Tool for Drone Defense

LiDAR’s high-resolution imaging is powerful in controlled, short-range environments. It’s great for mapping, object modeling, and self-driving cars. But when it comes to real-world drone detection, especially in complex, variable environments, radar is the clear choice.

For facilities that need situational awareness beyond the fence line, radar provides early warning, round-the-clock performance, and wide-area coverage—none of which LiDAR can match on its own.